| Psoriasis is not just a skin disease. It's actually an immune disorder, in which activated T cells cause the skin to go into hyperdrive. There are plenty of treatments on the market, too -- yet many are toxic and none is able to cure the disease, which affects about seven million Americans. Those facts make psoriasis an irresistible target for biotech companies. Yet back in the early 1990s, every firm that took a putative therapeutic into the clinic met with defeat. All that's changed today, though: Several high-profile drugs are already under regulatory review, while scores of others are achieving outstanding results in clinical trials. |

It's funny the way advertising works: A company can spend thousands, if not millions, of dollars on an advertising campaign that's guaranteed to etch the identity of a particular product into your brain forever. Who among us doesn't instantly equate "Where's the beef?" with Wendy's Restaurants? Or "Like a rock" with Chevy trucks? (Although rock and roll great Bob Seger and his Silver Bullet Band should get the honors here.)
But clever ad campaigns can backfire: Like as not, we'll remember the slogan or the catchy little jingle forever, yet never be able to recall what product it was supposed to sell. That's the way it is with "the heartbreak of psoriasis," a phrase that's stuck with me for decades. I could never figure out what a skin rash and broken hearts had in common, either -- but I know now.

For psoriasis is no mere skin rash. Au contraire: It's actually an immune disorder (with a genetic component thrown in for good measure) in which skin cells multiply and accumulate faster than they can be sloughed off. In fact, these cells grow about seven times more quickly than normal. They manifest as plaques, but the root cause lies much deeper.
Prompted by the 1979 discovery that cyclosporine, a drug that suppresses the immune system, was effective for treating psoriasis, researchers have discovered many -- but not all -- of the immunologic events that cause psoriasis. In short, the activation of T cells is the key trigger.
But how do T cells become activated in the first place? According to the National Psoriasis Foundation, two interactions are required. First, an antigen-presenting cell (APC) displays an antigen on its surface that's recognized by a compatible receptor on the T cell. (It's not yet known what the specific antigen or antigens might be.) Second, the APC and the T cell must connect across one or more co-stimulatory pathways for the T cell to become activated (see the diagram below).
Diagram provided by the National Psoriasis Foundation/USA.
Once activated, these cells wreak havoc. First, they release cytokines, which signal keratinocytes (which reside in the outer epidermal layer of the skin) to divide rapidly -- a phenomenon called hyperproliferation.
According to Gerald Krueger, professor of dermatology at the University of Utah School of Medicine, "Cytokines released from activated T cells will stimulate keratinocytes to grow at an increased rate, but what they bind to and the molecular pathway [involved] are not known."
"Within the skin cells of psoriasis patients are cellular elements that are hyper-responsive to these [cytokine] mediators," Krueger explained. "This hyper-responsiveness is inherent in the skin of psoriasis patients."
Still, he said, no products in development at this point actually target keratinocytes. "Earlier work showed that it's not nearly as effective as going after the cause of the problem," Krueger continued. It's a general rule that the lymphocyte is a target that's more responsive to therapy than the keratinocyte." As well, "To knock out keratinocytes you have to generate a high level of toxicity. Going after keratinocytes with a systemic agent will knock out all rapidly dividing cells." Some topical agents, however, might prove effective.
Activated T cells actually set off a cascade of reactions, including the activation of additional T cells and their recruitment into the skin. This results in the formation of lesions, which are full of antigen-presenting cells (macrophages, Langerhans cells and dendritic cells) -- which, in turn, are highly stimulatory for T cells.
In order to be effective, a drug must be able to break this cycle. And, as we shall see, the overwhelming majority of biotech drugs now being developed for psoriasis are designed to stop the cycle before it begins -- by interfering directly with T cell activation. They're very specific, and thus should not interfere with normal immune system function (unlike cyclosporine). Even these potential wonder drugs, however, don't offer an outright cure.

And that's part of the heartbreak: Psoriasis is a life-long condition that can be extremely debilitating. It doesn't discriminate between men and women, or the young and the elderly. It comes and goes, too, in concert with the changing of the seasons or emotional stress and strain. When the affected skin is visible -- on the hands, for instance -- it causes emotional and social suffering as well. And, rarely, psoriasis kills: About 400 people die each year from complications of severe psoriasis.
Psoriasis manifests as inflamed red plaques covered by silvery white scales, which shed constantly. Even in its mildest form -- when only one or two plaques develop -- psoriasis can cause stinging, burning, bleeding and intense itching. One patient describes it like this: "I feel like someone has poured itching powder through my head and it is running down my veins."
But psoriasis can become extremely widespread, covering the entire skin. That's bad enough, for patients lose the ability to regulate their body temperature (among its many jobs, the skin, our largest organ, helps control body heat). And when erythrodermic (widespread) psoriasis is combined with the pustular form of the disease, a condition known as Zumbusch psoriasis, it's life threatening.
Fortunately, most sufferers (about 75 percent to 80 percent) have the mild form of the disease -- defined as affecting less than two percent of the body surface (knees, elbows, scalp, hands and feet). They control their outbreaks with various moisturizers and over-the-counter and prescription ointments and shampoos. In moderate psoriasis, up to 10 percent of the skin is affected -- including the arms, legs and torso. Here, too, topical treatments seem to work (steroids, coal tar and retinoids such as Tazorac), but many patients turn to phototherapy (with ultraviolet light B or psoralen) and oral medications.
When more than 10 percent of the skin is affected, it's severe psoriasis --and as such requires more powerful, systemic medications, such as methotrexate and cyclosporine. But that's not all: Patients with severe psoriasis can also develop psoriatic arthritis -- the worst of both worlds.
Sadly, for the seven million Americans who suffer from psoriasis, none of the treatments in use today can cure the disease. Happily, that's just the sort of challenge that biotech companies find irresistible. As a result, a whole new generation of drugs is now in the clinic -- and two of them are waiting for regulatory review. (Three of the charts that are scattered throughout this article provide details of psoriasis drugs that are in active development.) The later-stage biotherapies have performed remarkably well in clinical trials: They may not provide a cure, but they are safe, effective at clearing the disease and long-acting. But it wasn't always that way.

Until recently, biotech companies that took their psoriasis drug candidates into the clinic suffered as many heartbreaks as the patients: For years, one compound after another met with defeat. To each company's ultimate frustration, it wasn't that the drugs failed per se, but rather that they couldn't outperform the placebo. Not a one could demonstrate undisputed clinical efficacy. (Two of the tables in this article provide details concerning the many psoriasis drug development programs that have either been discontinued or put on hold over the last nine years -- some of them quite recently.)
1993 was a particularly bad year for psoriasis trials. For instance, Agouron Pharmaceuticals Inc. (now a Pfizer Inc. company) tried a topical formulation of a small molecule drug, which the firm had designed to inactivate thymidylate synthase, an enzyme known to be required for the proliferation of human cells. But there just wasn't enough evidence of efficacy to convince the company to continue product development.
And the topical drug being developed by Sphinx Pharmaceuticals Inc. (which was acquired by Eli Lilly and Co. in September 1994) also fell short of its goal, forcing the biotech firm to discontinue development of Kynac, which targeted protein kinase C (which regulates cellular proliferation, among other things).
Chemex Pharmaceuticals Inc. (which was acquired by Access Pharmaceuticals Inc. in January 1996 through a reverse merger) lost two compounds this way: The company was testing a platelet-activating factor antagonist in one trial, and a zinc salt of methotrexate in another (both topical formulations). Each demonstrated some benefical effects, but they were too minimal to pursue.
Psoriasis Drug Trials That Have Been Discontinued Or Put On Hold
|
Company
|
Product Name
|
Product Type
|
Mode Of Action
|
Indication (Mode Of Administration)*
|
Outcome
|
|
AEterna Laboratories
|
Psovascar
(AE-941)
|
Naturally occurring anti-angiogenesis compound extracted from shark cartilage
|
Anti-angiogenic; also blocks VEGF binding; inhibits MMPs; induces endothelial
cell-specific apoptosis
|
Moderate plaque psoriasis (O)
|
Completed Phase I/II trial 7/98; results were statistically significant;
company reviewing alternatives to pursue continued development
|
|
Agouron Pharmaceuticals (Pfizer)
|
AG-85
|
Small molecule, rationally designed to inactivate enzyme thymidylate
synthase
|
Thymidylate synthase known to be required for cell hyperproliferation
|
Plaque psoriasis (T)
|
Early-phase trials failed to provide convincing evidence of efficacy;
program discontinued 7/93
|
|
Alexion Pharmaceuticals
|
5G1.1
|
Humanized Mab C5 complement inhibitor
|
Selectively blocks production of inflammatory proteins (complement cascade)
|
Severe psoriasis (IV)
|
Completed Phase Ib trial 6/01; company may consider further clinical
development
|
Axys Pharmaceuticals (being acquired by CeleraGenomics)
|
APC 2059
|
Tryptase inhibitor; 2nd-generation synthetic small molecule
|
Inhibits tryptase, which is found in mast cells (which are involved in
inflammatory processes)
|
Mild-to-moderate psoriasis (T)
|
Phase II trial showed no difference between placebo and treated sites
of skin disease; discontinued 11/99
|
|
BioCryst Pharmaceuticals
|
BCX-34
|
Small molecule; rationally designed to inhibit purine nucleoside phosphorylase
(PNP, which is required to maintain normal DNA synthesis)
|
Inhibits T cell proliferation
|
Moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (T)
|
Phase III trials did not show statistically significant results between
treated and placebo group; program discontinued 9/97
|
|
BioCryst Pharmaceuticals
|
BCX-34
|
Small molecule; designed to inhibit purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP,
which is required to maintain normal DNA synthesis)
|
Inhibits T cell proliferation
|
Moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (O)
|
Phase I/II initiated 11/96; dose levels inadequate to inhibit enough
of the enzyme to affect T-cell numbers; program discontinued early 2000;
now developing a more potent PNP inhibitor, BCX-1777
|
Chemex Pharmaceuticals (Access Pharmaceuticals)
|
TCV-309
|
Platelet-activating factor (PAF) antagonist
|
PAF is a cytokine mediator that produces inflammation
|
Mild-to-moderate psoriasis (T)
|
Minimal benefit in Phase I trial; program discontinued 1993
|
* Mode of administration: IM (Intramuscular); IV (intravenous); O (oral); SQ (subcutaneous); T (topical: applies to ointment, cream, gel)
These companies had run up against the placebo effect -- a major problem in such trials. For one thing, when the trial is designed to test the drug on one lesion and the placebo on another (say one on each side of the abdomen), the patient's expectations can actually result in marked improvement of both lesions. For another, when patients are applying the medication themselves, they have been known to use both the drug and the placebo on the same lesion -- or to get them mixed up.
But there's more to it than that: Remember that psoriasis comes and goes in an unpredictable manner that can't be planned for when designing a trial. And, it's known to be affected beneficially by sunlight, so it's usually worse in the winter than it is in the summer. Any clinical trial that spans the seasons is surely asking for trouble.
That's what The Immune Response Corp.'s investigators discovered when they analyzed the first Phase II clinical trial of the firm's therapeutic vaccine IR502. This trial, which was completed in December 1996, tested the putative vaccine (consisting of two CD8 T cell receptor peptides combined with an adjuvant) in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. This vaccine was injected, a route of administration that presumably should not encounter the placebo effects seen with topical drugs. Nonetheless, there was a marked placebo effect: All the patients improved. This trial also spanned the seasons, lasting from January through August. Many of the patients, as it turned out, were treated in the spring and summer.
But Immune Response didn't accept defeat: Buoyed by patients' positive response to the vaccine, and cognizant of the seasonal nature of the disease, the firm conducted another Phase II trial, in which the patients once again exhibited clinical improvement. That trial was completed in May 1998; since then, Immune Response has put the vaccine on the back burner, waiting for a partner to fund further development.

Two other biotech firms stuck it out in the face of setbacks: Both Seragen Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals Inc. ran into difficulties during Phase II trials --and neither had to do with a placebo problem.
Seragen's trial had to be halted after one of the patients developed a blood clot (from which that person recovered). After the FDA found no links between the product and the adverse event, it lifted the clinical hold. However, Seragen decided not to resume the trial: The company had already treated a sufficient number of patients to see that its IL-2 fusion protein (Ontak) was producing statistically significant results -- it was able to reduce both disease severity and lesion thickness.
Psoriasis Drug Trials That Have Been Discontinued Or Put On Hold
|
Company
|
Product Name
|
Product Type
|
Mode Of Action
|
Indication (Mode Of Administration)*
|
Outcome
|
Chemex Pharmaceuticals (Access Pharmaceuticals)
|
Methotrezate
|
Zinc salt of methotrexate
|
Antifolate; arrests cell growth
|
Severe psoriasis (T)
|
Minimal benefit in Phase I trial; program discontinued 1993
|
|
Immune Response
|
IR502
|
Two CD8 T cell receptor peptides, combined with adjuvant; therapeutic
vaccine
|
Inhibits or down-regulates T cells
|
Moderate-to-severe psoriasis (IM)
|
In 1st Phase II trial, completed 12/96, product did not perform statistically
better than control; in 2nd Phase II trial, completed 5/98, patients exhibited
clinical improvement; company is seeking partner for further development
|
|
Protein Design Labs
|
Nuvion (HuM291)
|
Humanized Mab that targets the CD3 antigen on T cells
|
Induces apoptosis of activated T cells
|
Moderate-to-severe psoriasis (IV)
|
In Phase I/II trial, patients experienced symptoms of cytokine release
syndrome; product development discontinued 6/01
|
|
Sphinx Pharmaceuticals (Eli Lilly)
|
Kynac
|
Protein kinase C inhibitor
|
Key intracellular enzyme that regulates proliferation, among other cellular
processes
|
Plaque psoriasis (T)
|
Effect on psoriatic lesions not clinically meaningful; product development
discontinued 1993
|
Sugen (Pharmacia)
|
SU5271
|
Synthetic small molecule signal transduction inhibitor
|
Interrupts epidermal growth factor (EGF) signal transduction by binding
to EGF receptor; blocks growth of keratinocytes
|
Plaque-type psoriasis (T)
|
Phase I/II trial data were not compelling; product development was put
on hold (1999)
|
|
Vertex Pharmaceuticals
|
VX-497
|
Rationally designed drug that inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase
(IMPDH), a cellular enzyme that is essential for production of guanine
nucleotides
|
Blocks DNA synthesis, thus proliferation of lymphocytes
|
Severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis (O)
|
Initiated Phase II clinical trial 1/99; apparently dropped clinical development
in favor of 2nd generation IMPDH inhibitor, VX-148 (plans to initiate
Phase II trial by end of 2001)
|
* Mode of administration: IM (Intramuscular); IV (intravenous); O (oral); SQ (subcutaneous); T (topical: applies to ointment, cream, gel)
Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc., which subsequently acquired Seragen, ran another study and also found positive results. It's unclear, though, whether Ligand will follow through with large-scale trials.
BioCryst's problem didn't even involve patients. In June 1995, an error popped up in the analysis of Phase II data on the topical version of its small molecule drug candidate BCX-34. The company had thought its results were statistically significant -- but that conclusion went out the window after it discovered that faulty randomization codes had counted some placebo results as drug-induced.
Unbowed, the firm went back into the clinic with its topical drug, shepherding it all the way through Phase III trials. Once again, however, the results weren't statistically significant. BioCryst also tried an oral formulation of BCX-34, but discontinued the program early last year when it found that the dose levels being used weren't adequate enough to inhibit the activity of its target enzyme purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP), which is specifically required for normal DNA synthesis in T cells.
Since then, BioCryst has in-licensed a series of more powerful PNP inhibitors from Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University and New Zealand-based Industrial Research Ltd. BioCryst is just about to launch the first clinical trial of its new lead candidate, BCX-1777, but not in psoriasis. Instead, the company is testing BCX-1777 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a T-cell proliferative disease. Why? "There's an important medical need for a new treatment for ALL," explained J. Claude Bennett, BioCryst's president and COO. "There's not a good second-line therapy. Once these patients are in remission, there's not much that can be done [in terms of maintenance therapy]." The company is hoping to establish BCX-1777's safety and efficacy profile in the ALL trials, too, where it will be administered intravenously. As to psoriasis? Because "there are now at least three good drugs that can achieve a 75 percent response rate in psoriasis, to take them on we need to first establish a base in ALL," Bennett said.

Phase II clinical trials ended up being a sticking point for Isis Pharmaceuticals Inc., too -- but, like Immune Response and several other biotech companies striving to develop therapies for this difficult disease, Isis forged ahead. The company's first product, ISIS 2302, is an antisense oligonucleotide designed to inhibit intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), which plays a role in immune cell activation and trafficking to sites of inflammation.
Isis initially tested an intravenous formulation of the ICAM-1 inhibitor in psoriasis patients, but by the end of Phase II trials it was obvious that very little of the drug was actually getting to the dermal and epidermal skin layers. Importantly, however, Isis did see a modest clinical benefit -- so it switched to a topical formulation.
This appears to work. The Phase II trial results, reported at the 2nd Joint Meeting of the International Psoriasis Symposium and the European Congress on Psoriasis, held in San Francisco in June 2001, demonstrated that ISIS 2302 was able to penetrate psoriatic lesions and reduce plaque thickness. And, although not quite statistically significant (due to a high placebo response), the data showed a strong trend favoring a relationship between increased concentrations of the drug and reduction of plaque thickness (induration). The trend was encouraging enough that Isis is now starting to gather the data from a larger study with the highest (4% cream) drug concentration. The company should be presenting these at the American Academy of Dermatology meeting in February 2002, said F. Andrew Dorr, Isis' vice president and chief medical officer.
Psoriasis Drug Trials: Active Programs**
|
Company
|
Product Name
|
Product Type
|
Mode of Action
|
Indication (Mode Of Administration)
|
Clinical Status
|
|
Abgenix
|
ABX-IL8
|
Fully human Mab; blocks activity of interleukin-8 (IL-8)
|
IL-8 contributes to inflammatory process; levels can be elevated 150X
in psoriatic tissue; IL-8 is growth factor for proliferating skin cells;
IL-8 is also an angiogenesis factor
|
Moderate-to-severe psoriasis (IV)
|
Phase IIa trial results statistically significant; initiated Phase IIb
trial 3/01
|
|
Angiotech Pharmaceuticals
|
Micellar Paclitaxel Injection
|
Yew tree-derived semisynthetic taxoid
|
Paclitaxel is anti-microtubule agent (inhibits cell growth); also inhibits
inflammatory cell response and angiogenesis
|
Severe psoriasis (IV)
|
Initiated Phase II study at NCI 11/00
|
|
Biogen
|
Amevive (alefacept)
|
Fusion protein; human LFA-3 IgG1 fusion protein (a.k.a., LFA3TIP)
|
Blocks activation of T cells by interfering with LFA3/CD2 co-stimulatory
pathway; binds to CD2 on T cell
|
Moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis (IV or IM)
|
Under regulatory review; FDA and European Agency for the Evaluation of
Medicinal Products both accepted applications for review 10/01
|
Centocor (Johnson & Johnson)
|
Remicade (infliximab)
|
Chimeric Mab to tumor necrosis factor-alpha
|
Blocks TNF-alpha (key inflammatory mediator)
|
Moderate-to-severe psoriasis (IV)
|
Investigator-initiated Phase II study at the University of Medicine and
Dentistry of New Jersey demonstrated high degree of efficacy, rapid response
and sustained benefit
|
|
Connetics
|
Olux
|
Foam formulation of super high potency topical steroid (clobetasol proprionate)
|
Reduces inflammation; also has immunosuppressive and anti-proliferative
effects
|
Mild-to-moderate body psoriasis (T)
|
Statistically significant results in Phase IV clinical trial 11/01: company
will file sNDA by 1/02 (product 1st approved by FDA for treating corticosteroid-responsive
scalp psoriasis in 5/00)
|
|
Corixa
|
PVAC
|
Heat-killed Mycobacterium vaccae extract
|
Immunomodulator
|
Moderate-to-severe psoriasis (ID)
|
Failed to meet primary endpoint of Phase II study 2/01 but did show clinical
benefit
|
* Mode of administration: ID (intradermal); IM (intramuscular); IV (intravenous); O (oral); SQ (subcutaneous); T (topical: applies to ointment, cream, gel)
** Excludes phototherapies.
"As a platform for dermatological disease, topical antisense is very promising as it has the ability to target specific molecules involved in skin disease without systemic toxicity," commented Utah's Krueger, who presented the trial results in June.
That's what Isis is counting on: Also in June, the company started a Phase II trial in mild-to-moderate psoriasis using a topical formulation of a second-generation antisense drug, ISIS 104838, targeted against tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). It's also planning a trial in moderate-to-severe disease -- where the drug will be administered subcutaneously -- which should start no later than the second quarter of 2002, according to Dorr.
"Oligonucleotides given topically distribute to both the epidermis and the dermis, but without a lot of systemic uptake," Dorr explained. With ISIS 2302, "We get good uptake into the endothelium of the blood vessels (where ICAM is found) in the dermis, but the drug goes no further into the circulation," he continued. But TNF-alpha is another story: "We're not sure where the target cell is. It could be in the skin, or systemic, or both."

In fact, targeting TNF-alpha could be just the ticket. There's ample proof that it's a major player in inflammatory diseases -- and that biotech drugs are able to gum it up. Best-selling rheumatoid arthritis drugs Enbrel and Remicade both block TNF-alpha. And, excitingly, there's every sign that they'll work in psoriasis, too.
It even appears that Enbrel is an effective therapy for psoriatic arthritis, a devastating disease that combines the stiffness and joint destruction of arthritis with the inflamed, scaly patches of psoriasis. Data from a three month clinical trial demonstrated that 87 percent of patients given Enbrel saw an improvement in their disease, compared with 23 percent of patients who received placebo. Enbrel was also effective at clearing plaques: 40 percent of patients saw their psoriasis clear by 50 percent or more; 20 percent of the patients saw a 75 percent or higher improvement. Reportedly, Immunex Corp. is exploring Enbrel's use in psoriasis as well.
In July 2001 Immunex filed a supplemental BLA for Enbrel's use in treating psoriatic arthritis (either alone or in combination with methotrexate). According to Mark Lebwohl, professor and chairman of dermatology at Mount Sinai Medical Center, one out of every 10 psoriasis patients he examines suffers from psoriatic arthritis. (It affects about 300,000 individuals in the U.S.) "My hope is that we are one step closer to treating a disease that has not yet seen adequate treatment," he said. It's no wonder that physicians are enthusiastic: The FDA has never before reviewed a drug specifically for treating psoriatic arthritis.

Meanwhile, Centocor Inc.'s Remicade is producing "socko" results in psoriatic patients, according to Alice Gottlieb, professor of medicine and W.H. Conzen Chair in clinical pharmacology at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ) - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.
Gottlieb, who started the Psoriasis Clinic Research Center at UMDNJ in 1995, conducted a small Phase II trial of Remicade in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (covering at least five percent of the body surface). And the results, published in the June 9, 2001 issue of The Lancet, were fabulous. "The high degree of efficacy and rapid response seen in patients treated with Remicade far exceeded our expectations," she said. "It's clear that TNF-alpha plays a role in psoriasis."
In the 10-week trial, 33 patients received infusions of Remicade or placebo at baseline and at weeks two and six. The data showed that 82 percent of the patients receiving 5 mg/kg of the drug and 91 percent of patients receiving 10 mg/kg (vs 18 percent of the placebo group) achieved the primary endpoint -- a good, excellent or clear Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) rating -- at week 10. "Our primary endpoint ['good or better'] was too conservative, actually," Gottlieb said. "We should have picked 'excellent' [75-99 percent clearing]."
Psoriasis Drug Trials: Active Programs**
|
Company
|
Product Name
|
Product Type
|
Mode of Action
|
Indication (Mode Of Administration)
|
Clinical Status
|
|
Genentech and Xoma
|
Xanelim (efalizumab)
|
Humanized Mab targeted to T cells (anti CD11a)
|
Inhibits binding of T cells to other cell types; blocks receptor's binding
to adhesion molecules on endothelial cells and inhibits T-cell activation
|
Moderate-to-severe psoriasis (SQ; initially IV)
|
Positive results demonstrated in 2 pivotal Phase III trials, which both
hit primary endpoints in preliminary analysis 5/01; FDA requested additional
study (manufacturing equivalence) 10/01 that will delay BLA filing
|
|
Genmab
|
HuMax-CD4
|
Fully human Mab; targets CD4 receptor on T cells
|
Interferes with inflammatory process
|
Psoriasis (IV)
|
Phase II results presented at American College Of Rheumatology
conference on 11/12/01
|
|
Icos (partnered with Biogen)
|
IC747
|
Oral, small molecule LFA-1 antagonist; leukocyte function-associated
antigen-1 is a cell adhesion molecule that promotes T cell migration and
activation
|
Inhibits T cell activation and migration
|
Psoriasis (O)
|
Initiated Phase I trial 7/01
|
|
Idec Pharmaceuticals
|
IDEC-114
|
Primatized anti-B7-1 (CD80) Mab; binds to CD80 co-stimulatory molecule
on antigen-presenting cells (B cells)
|
Causes either apoptosis or anergy; inhibits binding of APC cells and
T cells, thus blocks second signal for T-cell activation
|
Moderate-to-severe psoriasis (IV)
|
Initiated Phase II trial 1/01
|
|
Idec Pharmaceuticals
|
IDEC-131
|
Humanized anti-CD154 (anti-CD40L) Mab (targets CD40 on T cells)
|
Targets CD154-CD40 pathway (regulates interaction between B and T cells)
|
Moderate-to-severe psoriasis (IV)
|
Initiated Phase II trial 1/01
|
|
Immunex
|
Enbrel (etanercept)
|
Dimeric fusion protein; recombinant soluble p75 tumor necrosis factor
receptor (TNFr) linked to Fc portion of human IgG1 (TNF inhibitor)
|
Binds TNF, one of dominate cytokines that play important role in both
normal immune function and cascade of reactions that cause inflammation
|
Psoriatic arthritis (+/- methotrexate) (IV)
|
Supplemental BLA (sBLA) filed in US 7/01; supplemental NDS (new drug
submission) filed in Canada 7/01 (Will be 1st product ever reviewed by FDA to treat psoriatic arthritis)
|
* Mode of administration: ID (intradermal); IM (intramuscular); IV (intravenous); O (oral); SQ (subcutaneous); T (topical: applies to ointment, cream, gel)
** Excludes phototherapies.
Gottlieb also assessed disease severity using the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI). According to this secondary endpoint, 82 percent of patients receiving the low dose of Remicade and 73 percent of those getting the high dose (vs 18 percent on placebo) achieved a 75 percent improvement (the "gold standard" in psoriasis trials). "This response rate is comparable to cyclosporine," according to Gottlieb.
Moreover, preliminary long-term data presented in June at the international psoriasis meeting in San Francisco demonstrated that Remicade may provide a sustained high level of efficacy for more than eight months in these patients -- and that it's quick acting, able to achieve a statistically significant response within two weeks. "With one IV infusion, we're already half way there. The overwhelming majority [of patients] cleared by week 6. At the end [of the study], they all do," Gottlieb explained. The full long-term analysis of this trial will be completed once all enrolled patients reach the 12-month point.
"Based on the results of this study, Centocor [ a Johnson & Johnson company] is pursuing it," Gottlieb continued. "We need to see Remicade's long-term efficacy and safety as a monotherapy."

While blocking the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-alpha looks like a sure hit, there's another approach to treating the root cause of psoriasis that also looks like a winner: Blocking T-cell activation in the first place. That's how both Xanelim and Amevive work (among others).
Xanelim, being developed by Genentech Inc. and Xoma Ltd., is a humanized monoclonal antibody (anti-CD11a) designed to bind with a subunit of the LFA-1 receptor on the surface of the T cell. In theory, blocking this receptor should prevent T-cell activation. And Biogen Inc.'s Amevive (LFA3TIP) is a fusion protein that binds the CD2 receptor on T cells, thus interfering with the LFA-3/CD2 co-stimulatory bridge. (Please refer to the diagram above for details.)
Just five months ago, in mid-June, it wasn't clear which product would take the upper hand. Presentations of Phase III data on both drugs at the international psoriasis meeting in San Francisco were encouraging. Thirty-nine percent of patients who received the low dose of Xanelim showed a 75 percent improvement in the PASI score after 12 weeks; 40 percent of patients receiving two intravenous courses of Amevive also showed a 75 percent or greater improvement in the PASI score two weeks after completion of a 12-week course of treatment.
But in early October, the FDA threw Xoma and Genentech a curve: The agency now requires the companies to conduct an additional pharmacokinetics study to confirm head-to-head equivalence of the material used for clinical trials and that which will be manufactured large-scale. This delay pushed Xanelim's time line back considerably: The companies now say they won't be filing a BLA until the summer of 2002.
That makes it a sure bet that Amevive will be first up for regulatory review: Biogen filed for approval in the U.S. and Europe in August 2001; both applications have been accepted.
Psoriasis Drug Trials: Active Programs**
|
Company
|
Product Name
|
Product Type
|
Mode of Action
|
Indication (Mode Of Administration)
|
Clinical Status
|
|
Isis Pharmaceuticals
|
ISIS 2302
|
Antisense inhibitor of ICAM-1 (intercellular adhesion molecule-1)
|
Interferes with activation of T cells and trafficking of those cells
to sites of inflammation
|
To reduce thickness of plaques in mild-to-moderate psoriasis (T)
|
Phase II trial results not statistically significant 6/01; company is
conducting 2nd trial at highest dose level used in 1st trial
|
|
Isis Pharmaceuticals
|
ISIS 104838
|
2nd generation antisense inhibitor of TNF-alpha
|
Inhibits TNF-alpha, a known pro-inflammatory cytokine
|
To reduce thickness of plaques in mild-to-moderate psoriasis (T)
|
Initiated Phase II trial 6/01
|
|
Ligand Pharmaceuticals
|
Targretin Capsules (bexarotene)
|
Synthetic retinoid analog
|
Selectively activates retinoid X receptors; reduces cell proliferation
and hyperproliferation
|
Moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in patients with prior therapies
(O)
|
Positive results in Phase II trial 3/01
|
|
MedImmune (collaboration with BioTransplant)
|
MEDI-507 (siplizumab)
|
Humanized Mab that binds to CD2 receptor on T cells and NK cells
|
Suppresses function of T and NK cells
|
Moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (IV and SQ)
|
Phase II trial ongoing; initiated Phase I PK/PD study 7/01
|
|
Protein Design Labs
|
Zenapax (dacluzimab)
|
Humanized Mab that binds to CD25 subunit (a.k.a., TAC or p55 alpha) of
the high-affinity IL-2 receptor expressed on activated T cells
|
IL-2 receptor antagonist; inhibits IL-2 mediated activation of T cells
|
Moderate-to-severe psoriasis (to maintain remission following clearance
by cyclosporine) (IV)
|
Phase II trial results expected 1Q:02
|
Seragen (Ligand Pharmaceuticals)
|
Ontak (denileukin diftitox)
|
IL-2 fusion protein; diphtheria toxin Fragment A-Fragment B genetically
fused to human IL-2
|
Targets high affinity IL-2 receptors on activated T cells
|
Moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (IV)
|
Ligand reported positive results of pilot study 3/01 (Note: Seragen earlier took this product through Phase II trials, and
reported positive results in 11/96)
|
* Mode of administration: ID (intradermal); IM (intramuscular); IV (intravenous); O (oral); SQ (subcutaneous); T (topical: applies to ointment, cream, gel)
** Excludes phototherapies.
Biogen studied two formulations of Amevive -- both intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) -- in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Both formulations work, too. Moreover, patients taking Amevive are disease-free for up to eight months.
According to Gloria Vigliani, Biogen's VP of medical research, "Amevive is a drug that tends to have a fairly slow onset, about four to six weeks after the beginning of treatment [once-weekly dosing]." One of its major properties, however, is the duration of the response, she said. "After a single course of treatment [12 weeks] the median duration is about seven months." And the company has treated some patients with two courses; some of them have been in remission for nearly a year, Vigliani said. "We're continuing to follow them until they require retreatment."
Biogen's also following patients to determine the long-term safety of Amevive. "We've followed patients from the Phase II trial up to three to four years," she continued. "We're obviously looking at the long-term effect on the depression of T cells [which could increase the risks of opportunistic infection]." The company has conducted several sorts of studies, including vaccinating people with an experimental antigen that "nobody's seen before." In all cases, she said, "We've seen nothing to indicate any degree of immunosuppression related to the drug."

It's no surprise, then, that clinical researchers are very upbeat about Amevive -- as well as Xanelim, Remicade, Enbrel and many other earlier-stage bio-therapies that are making tremendous strides in the clinic.
"It's an exciting time for those of us treating patients with psoriasis," said Mt. Sinai's Lebwohl. "For the first time we have the ability to target specific steps in the development of the disease. In coming years, we'll have treatments that are safe and more effective than in the past.
"Many of the new agents such as Xanelim, given for long enough, will result in improvement in the large majority of patients with psoriasis," he said. As well, "Patients who clear with Amevive get long periods of remission, in some cases exceeding one year. It's much safer than methotrexate, too." As for psoriatic arthritis: "Enbrel results in rapid improvement of psoriatic arthritis; it's administered by injections, which patients can give themselves at home, there's no damaging effects on the liver or kidneys [unlike current therapies methotrexate and cyclosporine] and it can be used long-term."
But there are significant challenges still ahead, according to Utah's Krueger. "Will these drugs be accepted by third-party payors, by practicing dermatologists and by the patients?" He predicts that patients will, indeed, be willing to get dosed IV or IM if there's a clear benefit to be had.
Dermatologists, however, are another matter: "Dermatologists are screaming for something better. But they don't want [to deal with] intravenous drugs," according to Isis' Dorr.
Perhaps they won't have to -- at least not for long: "I'm aware of at least four oral drugs in development for psoriasis, but they're at least a couple of years away from approval," Lebwohl said.
In fact, according to Krueger, "There are some 40 different trials in the U.S. for psoriasis. I like to joke that every patient in America is in some trial or other." |